An online streaming company is prohibited from broadcasting its content in certain countries and regions in the world. Which Amazon Route 53 routing policy would be the most suitable in guaranteeing their compliance?

Answer options:

A.Geoproximity
B.Geolocation
C.Multi-value answer
D.Failover

Correct Answer – B
Amazon Route 53 geolocation routing policy makes it possible for different types of content to be served depending on the browser`s geographical location. In this use case, the streaming company can serve a restriction message if Amazon Route 53 detects origin requests from prohibited countries.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy.html#routing-policy-geo
Option A is INCORRECT because geo-proximity allows for DNS traffic to be routed in accordance with a bias or preset preference rule. This allows the user to be served with content from resources closest to their geographical location. This routing manipulates DNS traffic flow only. This routing policy is not the most suitable.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy.html#routing-policy-geoproximity
Option C is INCORRECT because a multi-value answer primarily addresses the quality of service and resources queried in DNS requests. This routing policy is not the most suitable.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy.html#routing-policy-multivalue
Option D is INCORRECT because failover allows for the automatic switch to healthy DNS resources if another becomes unavailable. It will not allow for the preferential serving of content based on the geographical location. This routing policy is not the most suitable.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy.html#routing-policy-multivalue