A game development company is developing a new online multiplayer game. Game user profile data will contain the user`s match history. Match history data is expected to be in size on the order of 500KB. Additionally, the user profile data schema is expected to go through revisions as new game features are implemented. How should the team store the user profile data?

Answer options:

A.Use Amazon DynamoDB to store user profile data.
B.Use Amazon RDS to store user profile data.
C.Use Amazon DynamoDB to store user profile data. Use Amazon RDS to store user match history.
D.Use Amazon DynamoDB to store user profile data. User S3 to store user match history. Store a link to the S3 object as an attribute in DynamoDB.

Answer: D
Option A is incorrect because the maximum item size in DynamoDB is 400KB.Option B is incorrect because the user profile schema will undergo frequent updates. Therefore, it is not suitable for a relational database.
Option C is incorrect because this solution does not relate the user profile to the user’s match history.
Option D is CORRECT because a recommended approach to storing items greater than 400KB in DynamoDB is to store them in S3, and link the S3 object as an attribute in DynamoDB.Reference:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/bp-use-s3-too.html