You are working on a small project for your personal usage. The application is hosted in an Auto Scaling group. There is only 1 instance in the ASG and the EC2 instance may be terminated and recreated from time to time. The EC2 DNS name and IP are changed when a new instance is launched in the ASG. You own a hosted zone in Route 53 and plan to create a record set to route the internal traffic to the instance. Which method is the most cost-efficient to update the record set dynamically?

Answer options:

A.Create a network load balancer to point to the Auto Scaling group. Create an Alias record that routes the traffic to the load balancer.
B.Create an Alias record in Route 53 that has the Auto Scaling group ARN as its target. The Route 53 record set does not need to be changed dynamically.
C.Configure a CloudWatch Event rule to monitor the Auto Scaling events. The CloudWatch Event rule triggers a Lambda function to point the CNAME in the record set to the private DNS of the new EC2 instance.
D.Create a T2.micro EC2 instance to periodically check the Auto Scaling group. If there is a new EC2 instance launched, update the Route 53 record set with the new IP address.

Correct Answer – C
A cost-efficient method is required in this scenario. The combinations of CloudWatch Event + Lambda function should be chosen. Please check https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/building-a-dynamic-dns-for-route-53-using-cloudwatch-events-and-lambda/ for the reference.
Option A is incorrect: This option needs to configure a network load balancer for the record set. It is not the most cost-efficient method.
Option B is incorrect: Because the Alias record in Route 53 cannot configure the Auto Scaling group ARN as its target. This option does not work.
Option C is CORRECT: Both CloudWatch Event rule and Lambda function are serverless and very cheap. CloudWatch Event can capture the ASG event and notify the Lambda function to update the record set accordingly.
Option D is incorrect: Option C is more cost-efficient as the T2.micro EC2 instance is unnecessary.