At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the `e-learning course`, was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage 3 plan identifies the consultant as a reviewer of the `e-learning course`. When preparing for a quality review of the `e-learning course`, the consultant found 15 possible errors. The consultant then documented these possible errors in the quality register. Is this an appropriate activity when preparing for a quality review, and why? 

Answer options:

A. Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
B. Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
C. No, because possible errors that are found when preparing for a quality review should be documented on a question list.
D. No, because the senior supplier should not be identified as a reviewer as part of the quality review technique.

B