Scenario - Additional Information - 

Further information on some resources who could be involved in the project: He represents Outcome which is a recruitment agency that provides specialist outsourcing resources. Outcome provided the Outcome Account Manager: consultants who carried out the feasibility study and the same consultants will be providing support and guidance to the Information Technology and Facilities teams during the project. She was transferred from the Information Technology Division 12 months ago. She is responsible for ensuring a cost-conscious Director of Finance Division: approach is adopted in all operational and project activities across the Ministry of Food Hygiene. Reports to the Director of Information Technology. He provides computer hardware to all business functions but has little awareness of the Hardware Manager: needs of his colleagues working in software. Reports to the Director of Finance. He is a very experienced and efficient qualified accountant who has much of the responsibility of running the Payroll Manager: Finance Division on behalf of the Director of Finance. He has been involved in drafting the Ministry`s business strategy and assisting in a full business risk assessment. He also drafted the corporate Business Case standards. Which 2 alternative actions apply to the proposed user assurance for this project? 

Answer options:

A. Retain because they are both very positive about outsourcing the selected business functions.
B. Retain because their divisions will be the major users of the outsourced services and they can provide the user perspective on the impact of any proposed changes.
C. Remove because neither of these individuals are from the business functions to be outsourced.
D. Retain because selecting only one of them may cause unnecessary conflict.
E. Retain because they are able to help identify stakeholders and their communication requirements.

BE