Which of the following security models characterizes the rights of each subject with respect to every object in the computer system? 

Answer options:

A. Clark-Wilson model
B. Bell-LaPadula model
C. Biba model
D. Access matrix

and r(s,o) R. A right thereby specifies the kind of access a subject is allowed to process with regard to an object. Answer: B is incorrect. The Bell-La Padula Model

The access matrix or access control matrix is an abstract, formal security model of protection state in computer systems that characterizes the rights of each subject with respect to every object in the system. It was first introduced by Butler W. Lampson in 1971. According to the access matrix model, the protection state of a computer system can be abstracted as a set of objects `O`, that is the set of entities that needs to be protected (e.g. processes, files, memory pages) and a set of subjects `S` that consists of all active entities (e.g. users, processes). Further there exists a set of rights `R` of the form r(s,o), where s S, o O is a state machine model used for enforcing access control in government and military applications. The model is a formal state transition model of computer security policy that describes a set of access control rules which use security labels on objects and clearances for subjects. Security labels range from the most sensitive (e.g.,"Top Secret"), down to the least sensitive (e.g., "Unclassified" or "Public"). The Bell-La Padula model focuses on data confidentiality and controlled Wilson model provides a foundation for specifying and analyzing an integrity policy for a computing system. The model is primarily concerned with formalizing the notion of information integrity. Information integrity is maintained by preventing corruption of data items in a system due to either error or malicious intent. The model`s enforcement and certification rules define data items and processes that provide the basis for an integrity policy. The core of the model is based on the rules designed to ensure data integrity. Data and subjects are grouped into ordered levels of integrity. The model is designed so that subjects may not corrupt data in a level ranked higher than the subject, or be corrupted by data from a lower level than the subject.